You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Speech Material on the Benefit of Temporal Fine Structure Information in Speech for Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Participants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182387a8c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Lunner, Renskje K. Hietkamp, Martin R. Andersen, Kathryn Hopkins, Brian C. J. Moore |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the type of speech material on the benefit obtained from temporal fine structure (TFS) information in speech for young normal-hearing (YNH) and older hearing-impaired (OHI) participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Engineering | 13 | 18% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,688,303
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,524
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,700
of 175,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.