| Title |
Therapeutic perspectives for structural and functional abnormalities of cilia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00018-019-03158-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Joon Kim, Joon Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,232,313
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,026
of 5,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,785
of 357,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#43
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.