| Title |
A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis with Non-Independent Effect Sizes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike W.-L. Cheung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 24% |
| Unknown | 70 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,281,116
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#118
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,928
of 351,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.