↓ Skip to main content

Contraceptive Method Choice Among Youth in the United States: The Importance of Relationship Context

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Contraceptive Method Choice Among Youth in the United States: The Importance of Relationship Context
Published in
Demography, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13524-011-0061-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasamin Kusunoki, Dawn M. Upchurch

Abstract

We examine the relationship characteristics associated with contraceptive method choice within young people's nonmarital sexual relationships, using data from retrospective relationship histories available in the third wave (2001-2002) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Data-reduction techniques produce a detailed multidimensional characterization of relationship commitment for nonmarital sexual relationships. We then use multilevel analysis to estimate associations between two key relationship characteristics-relationship commitment and couple heterogamy-and the type of contraceptive method used at last sexual intercourse within each relationship. Results indicate that for a given individual, contraceptive method choice varies across relationships as a function of these characteristics, even after we account for important individual and family characteristics and prior relationship experiences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Psychology 7 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,484,244
of 23,335,153 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#403
of 1,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,842
of 126,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,335,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.