You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Woodcock, Elisa G Liberati, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 101 | 44% |
| United States | 14 | 6% |
| Australia | 13 | 6% |
| Ireland | 6 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 85 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 127 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 27% |
| Scientists | 39 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#266,488
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#84
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,242
of 351,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.