↓ Skip to main content

Pre-diagnostic plasma bile acid levels and colon cancer risk: A prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-diagnostic plasma bile acid levels and colon cancer risk: A prospective study
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, August 2019
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djz166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tilman Kühn, Magdalena Stepien, Marina López-Nogueroles, Antje Damms Machado, Disorn Sookthai, Theron Johnson, Marta Roca, Anika Hüsing, Sandra González Maldonado, Amanda J Cross, Neil Murphy, Heinz Freisling, Sabina Rinaldi, Augustin Scalbert, Veronika Fedirco, Gianluca Severi, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Francesca Romana Mancini, Solomon A Sowah, Heiner Boeing, Paula Jakszyn, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Susana Merino, Sandra Colorado-Yohar, Aurelio Barricarte, Kay Tee Khaw, Julie A Schmidt, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Antonia Trichopoulou, Anna Karakatsani, Paschalis Thriskos, Domenico Palli, Claudia Agnoli, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Salvatore Panico, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Carla H van Gils, Alicia Heath, Marc J Gunter, Elio Riboli, Agustín Lahoz, Mazda Jenab, Rudolf Kaaks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#475,944
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#306
of 7,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,797
of 352,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.