You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Xenophobia’s Contours During an Ebola Epidemic: Proximity and the Targeting of Peul Migrants in Senegal
|
---|---|
Published in |
African Studies Review, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1017/asr.2019.38 |
Authors |
Ato Kwamena Onoma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 10% |
Sweden | 2 | 7% |
Bahamas | 1 | 3% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
Scientists | 8 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Energy | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,687,352
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from African Studies Review
#46
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,731
of 318,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Studies Review
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.