↓ Skip to main content

Concentrations of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Mothers and Newborns, and Effects on Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concentrations of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Mothers and Newborns, and Effects on Infection
Published in
Gastroenterology, April 2016
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Julsgaard, Lisbet A. Christensen, Peter R. Gibson, Richard B. Gearry, Jan Fallingborg, Christian L. Hvas, Bo M. Bibby, Niels Uldbjerg, William R. Connell, Ourania Rosella, Anne Grosen, Steven J. Brown, Jens Kjeldsen, Signe Wildt, Lise Svenningsen, Miles P. Sparrow, Alissa Walsh, Susan J. Connor, Graham Radford-Smith, Ian C. Lawrance, Jane M. Andrews, Kathrine Ellard, Sally J. Bell

Abstract

Little is known about in utero exposure to and postnatal clearance of anti- tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in neonates. We investigated the concentrations of adalimumab and infliximab in umbilical cord blood of newborns and rates of clearance after birth, and how these correlated with drug concentrations in mothers at birth and risk of infection during the first year of life. We performed a prospective study of 80 pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases at tertiary hospitals in Denmark, Australia, or New Zealand from March 2012 through November, 2014; 36 received adalimumab and 44 infliximab; 39 received concomitant thiopurines during pregnancy. Data were collected from medical records on disease activity and treatment before, during, and after pregnancy. Concentrations of anti-TNF agents were measured in blood samples from women at delivery and in umbilical cords, and in infants every 3 months until the drug was no longer detected. The time from last exposure to anti-TNF agent during pregnancy correlated inversely with concentration of the drugs in umbilical cord (r= -0.64 for adalimumab, P=.0003 and r= -0.77 for infliximab, P<.0001) and in mothers at time of birth (r= -0.80 for adalimumab and r= -0.80 for infliximab, P<.0001 for each). The median ratio of infant:mother drug concentration at birth was 1.21 for adalimumab (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.49) and 1.97 for infliximab (95% CI, 1.50-2.43). The mean time to drug clearance in infants was 4.0 months for adalimumab (95% CI, 2.9-5.0) and 7.3 months for infliximab (95% CI, 6.2-8.3; P<.0001). Drugs were not detected in infants after 12 months of age. Bacterial infections developed in 4 infants (5%) and viral infections developed in 16 (20%), all with benign courses. The relative risk for infection was 2.7 in infants whose mothers received the combination of an anti-TNF agent and thiopurine, compared with anti-TNF monotherapy (95% CI, 1.09-6.78; P=.02). In a prospective study of infants born to mothers who received anti-TNF agents during pregnancy, we detected the drugs until 12 months of age. There was an inverse correlation between time from last exposure during pregnancy and drug concentration in the umbilical cord. Infliximab was cleared more slowly than adalimumab from the infants. The combination of an anti-TNF agent and thiopurine therapy during pregnancy increased the relative risk for infant infections almost 3-fold, compared with anti-TNF monotherapy. Live vaccines should therefore be avoided for up to 1 year, unless drug clearance is documented, and pregnant women should be educated on risks of anti-TNF use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 206 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 22 11%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#720,774
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#613
of 12,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,806
of 319,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#12
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.