You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traversing the soft/hard power binary: the case of the Sino-Japanese territorial dispute
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of International Studies, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0260210519000251 |
| Authors |
Linus Hagström, Chengxin Pan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 35% |
| Sweden | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Scientists | 6 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 46% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,171,444
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Review of International Studies
#178
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,794
of 340,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of International Studies
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.