| Title |
A multi-country, multi-sector replication challenge to the validity of the cultural tightness-looseness measure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10490-019-09682-0 |
| Authors |
Len J. Treviño, Carolyn P. Egri, David A. Ralston, Irina Naoumova, Olivier Furrer, Yongjuan Li, Fidel León Darder, María Teresa de la Garza Carranza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 32% |
| Psychology | 3 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,939,105
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Management
#46
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,971
of 341,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them