| Title |
Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-019-00260-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandeep Dalal, Vadiraj Hombal, Wei-Hung Weng, Gabe Mankovich, Thusitha Mabotuwana, Christopher S. Hall, Joseph Fuller, Bruce E. Lehnert, Martin L. Gunn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,181,055
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#95
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,276
of 340,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.