| Title |
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Cryoablation in the Treatment of T1a Renal Tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-019-02313-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco De Cobelli, Maurizio Papa, Marta Panzeri, Michele Colombo, Stephanie Steidler, Alessandro Ambrosi, Roberta Cao, Simone Gusmini, Paolo Marra, Umberto Capitanio, Roberto Bertini, Massimo Venturini, Andrea Losa, Franco Gaboardi, Francesco Montorsi, Gianpiero Cardone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 51% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,578,397
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,202
of 2,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,064
of 340,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.