| Title |
The implications of three major new trials for the effect of water, sanitation and hygiene on childhood diarrhea and stunting: a consensus statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1410-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Cumming, Benjamin F. Arnold, Radu Ban, Thomas Clasen, Joanna Esteves Mills, Matthew C. Freeman, Bruce Gordon, Raymond Guiteras, Guy Howard, Paul R. Hunter, Richard B. Johnston, Amy J. Pickering, Andrew J. Prendergast, Annette Prüss-Ustün, Jan Willem Rosenboom, Dean Spears, Shelly Sundberg, Jennyfer Wolf, Clair Null, Stephen P. Luby, Jean H. Humphrey, John M. Colford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 441 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 10% |
| Researcher | 33 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 193 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 6% |
| Engineering | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 214 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#623,852
of 24,570,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#445
of 3,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,580
of 345,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,570,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.