↓ Skip to main content

Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,852)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
78 X users
patent
2 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
Title
Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangjin Kang, Wenyin He, Yuling Huang, Qian Yu, Yaoyong Chen, Xingcheng Gao, Xiaofang Sun, Yong Fan

Abstract

As a powerful technology for genome engineering, the CRISPR/Cas system has been successfully applied to modify the genomes of various species. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technology and establish principles for the introduction of precise genetic modifications in early human embryos. 3PN zygotes were injected with Cas9 messenger RNA (mRNA) (100 ng/μl) and guide RNA (gRNA) (50 ng/μl). For oligo-injections, donor oligo-1 (99 bp) or oligo-2 (99 bp) (100 ng/μl) or dsDonor (1 kb) was mixed with Cas9 mRNA (100 ng/μl) and gRNA (50 ng/μl) and injected into the embryos. By co-injecting Cas9 mRNA, gRNAs, and donor DNA, we successfully introduced the naturally occurring CCR5Δ32 allele into early human 3PN embryos. In the embryos containing the engineered CCR5Δ32 allele, however, the other alleles at the same locus could not be fully controlled because they either remained wild type or contained indel mutations. This work has implications for the development of therapeutic treatments of genetic disorders, and it demonstrates that significant technical issues remain to be addressed. We advocate preventing any application of genome editing on the human germline until after a rigorous and thorough evaluation and discussion are undertaken by the global research and ethics communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 494 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 144 28%
Student > Master 84 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 13%
Researcher 45 9%
Other 19 4%
Other 60 12%
Unknown 91 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 153 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 8%
Engineering 20 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 106 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#44,894
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#3
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#820
of 316,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.