↓ Skip to main content

Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Gusev, Huwenbo Shi, Gleb Kichaev, Mark Pomerantz, Fugen Li, Henry W. Long, Sue A. Ingles, Rick A. Kittles, Sara S. Strom, Benjamin A. Rybicki, Barbara Nemesure, William B. Isaacs, Wei Zheng, Curtis A. Pettaway, Edward D. Yeboah, Yao Tettey, Richard B. Biritwum, Andrew A. Adjei, Evelyn Tay, Ann Truelove, Shelley Niwa, Anand P. Chokkalingam, Esther M. John, Adam B. Murphy, Lisa B. Signorello, John Carpten, M. Cristina Leske, Suh-Yuh Wu, Anslem J. M. Hennis, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Ann W. Hsing, Lisa Chu, Phyllis J. Goodman, Eric A. Klein, John S. Witte, Graham Casey, Sam Kaggwa, Michael B. Cook, Daniel O. Stram, William J. Blot, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas Easton, ZSofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G. Giles, Melissa C. Southey, Liesel M. Fitzgerald, Henrik Gronberg, Fredrik Wiklund, Markus Aly, Brian E. Henderson, Johanna Schleutker, Tiina Wahlfors, Teuvo L. J. Tammela, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Tim J. Key, Ruth C. Travis, David E. Neal, Jenny L. Donovan, Freddie C. Hamdy, Paul Pharoah, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Shannon K. McDonnell, Daniel J. Schaid, Christiane Maier, Walther Vogel, Manuel Luedeke, Kathleen Herkommer, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Wojciech Kluzniak, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Craig Teerlink, Hermann Brenner, Aida K. Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Jong Y. Park, Thomas A. Sellers, Hui-Yi Lin, Chavdar Slavov, Radka Kaneva, Vanio Mitev, Jyotsna Batra, Amanda Spurdle, Judith A. Clements, Manuel R. Teixeira, Hardev Pandha, Agnieszka Michael, Paula Paulo, Sofia Maia, Andrzej Kierzek, David V. Conti, Demetrius Albanes, Christine Berg, Sonja I. Berndt, Daniele Campa, E. David Crawford, W. Ryan Diver, Susan M. Gapstur, J. Michael Gaziano, Edward Giovannucci, Robert Hoover, David J. Hunter, Mattias Johansson, Peter Kraft, Loic Le Marchand, Sara Lindström, Carmen Navarro, Kim Overvad, Elio Riboli, Afshan Siddiq, Victoria L. Stevens, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Paolo Vineis, Meredith Yeager, Gosia Trynka, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Frederick R. Schumacher, Alkes L. Price, Matthew L. Freedman, Christopher A. Haiman, Bogdan Pasaniuc

Abstract

Although genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 risk loci that explain ∼33% of familial risk for prostate cancer (PrCa), their functional effects on risk remain largely unknown. Here we use genotype data from 59,089 men of European and African American ancestries combined with cell-type-specific epigenetic data to build a genomic atlas of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability in PrCa. We find significant differences in heritability between variants in prostate-relevant epigenetic marks defined in normal versus tumour tissue as well as between tissue and cell lines. The majority of SNP heritability lies in regions marked by H3k27 acetylation in prostate adenoc7arcinoma cell line (LNCaP) or by DNaseI hypersensitive sites in cancer cell lines. We find a high degree of similarity between European and African American ancestries suggesting a similar genetic architecture from common variation underlying PrCa risk. Our findings showcase the power of integrating functional annotation with genetic data to understand the genetic basis of PrCa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Professor 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 14 9%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Computer Science 10 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,965,998
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,508
of 53,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,241
of 306,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#460
of 819 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 819 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.