↓ Skip to main content

MDCT evaluation of complications of percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Radiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
MDCT evaluation of complications of percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement
Published in
Emergency Radiology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10140-019-01716-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rakhee S. Gawande, Christopher R. Bailey, Christopher Jones, Elliot K. Fishman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unspecified 2 29%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,559,907
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#401
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,854
of 340,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.