↓ Skip to main content

Regional Therapies for Advanced Cancer: Update for 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Regional Therapies for Advanced Cancer: Update for 2016
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2016
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-5068-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran K. Turaga, T. Clark Gamblin, H. Richard Alexander, Robert Edwards, David L. Bartlett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#12,951,914
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,594
of 6,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,048
of 393,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#43
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.