↓ Skip to main content

Amine oxidase activity of β-amyloid precursor protein modulates systemic and local catecholamine levels

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Psychiatry, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amine oxidase activity of β-amyloid precursor protein modulates systemic and local catecholamine levels
Published in
Molecular Psychiatry, January 2012
DOI 10.1038/mp.2011.168
Pubmed ID
Authors

J A Duce, S Ayton, A A Miller, A Tsatsanis, L Q Lam, L Leone, J E Corbin, H Butzkueven, T J Kilpatrick, J T Rogers, K J Barnham, D I Finkelstein, A I Bush

Abstract

The catecholamines dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) are neurotransmitters and hormones that mediate stress responses in tissues and plasma. The expression of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) is responsive to stress and is high in tissues rich in catecholamines. We recently reported that APP is a ferroxidase, subsuming, in neurons and other cells, the iron-export activity that ceruloplasmin mediates in glia. Here we report that, like ceruloplasmin, APP also oxidizes synthetic amines and catecholamines catalytically (K(m) NE=0.27 mM), through a site encompassing its ferroxidase motif and selectively inhibited by zinc. Accordingly, APP knockout mice have significantly higher levels of DA, NE and E in brain, plasma and select tissues. Consistent with this, these animals have increased resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure as well as suppressed prolactin and lymphocyte levels. These findings support a role for APP in extracellular catecholaminergic clearance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Psychology 4 14%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#3,754
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,008
of 244,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.