You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.1937 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael M Hoffman, Orion J Buske, Jie Wang, Zhiping Weng, Jeff A Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
| Abstract |
We trained Segway, a dynamic Bayesian network method, simultaneously on chromatin data from multiple experiments, including positions of histone modifications, transcription-factor binding and open chromatin, all derived from a human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line. In an unsupervised fashion, we identified patterns associated with transcription start sites, gene ends, enhancers, transcriptional regulator CTCF-binding regions and repressed regions. Software and genome browser tracks are at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/segway/. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 30% |
| Australia | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
| Scientists | 13 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 614 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 555 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 221 | 36% |
| Researcher | 140 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 41 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 277 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 141 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 76 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 6% |
| Unknown | 50 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,070,885
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,389
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,248
of 175,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.