| Title |
Factors that influence magnetic orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00359-019-01364-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Bainbridge, B. L. Clites, C. S. Caldart, B. Palacios, K. Rollins, D. A. Golombek, J. T. Pierce, A. G. Vidal-Gadea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,138,010
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,034
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,989
of 350,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.