↓ Skip to main content

Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions
Published in
Global Change Biology, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/gcb.14812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joachim Audet, David Bastviken, Mirco Bundschuh, Ishi Buffam, Alexander Feckler, Leif Klemedtsson, Hjalmar Laudon, Stefan Löfgren, Sivakiruthika Natchimuthu, Mats Öquist, Mike Peacock, Marcus B. Wallin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 27 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,949,519
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#2,440
of 6,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,152
of 358,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#61
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.