↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation study of 12 X chromosomal STR in central Thailand population

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Genetic variation study of 12 X chromosomal STR in central Thailand population
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00414-016-1363-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kornkiat Vongpaisarnsin, Achara Boonlert, Kawin Rasmeepaisarn, Piyawan Dangkao

Abstract

Genetic data from 12 short tandem repeats (STR) on the X chromosome are currently used in forensics studies to resolve issues related to complex kinship or when data is missing or ambiguous. In this study, we genotyped these 12 X chromosome STR in DNA collected from individuals from central Thailand (n = 391, 282 men and 109 women) and used this information to calculate allele and haplotype frequencies as well as forensic parameters for kinship calculations. Polymorphism information contents of the loci were range from 0.5283-0.9247, and powers of discrimination in females and males were 0.7666-0.9905 and 0.6085-0.9291, respectively. A diallelic pattern was observed at the locus DXS7132. Moreover, a comparison of genetic distance revealed a close relationship within Asian countries. Our results indicate that the X chromosomal short tandem repeat (X-STR) multiplex system provides highly informative genetic data and could be advantageous in forensic studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,844,479
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#845
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,074
of 300,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.