↓ Skip to main content

Austrian Lipid Consensus on the management of metabolic lipid disorders to prevent vascular complications

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Austrian Lipid Consensus on the management of metabolic lipid disorders to prevent vascular complications
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00508-016-0993-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hermann Toplak, Bernhard Ludvik, Monika Lechleitner, Hans Dieplinger, Bernhard Föger, Bernhard Paulweber, Thomas Weber, Bruno Watschinger, Sabine Horn, Thomas C. Wascher, Heinz Drexel, Marianne Brodmann, Ernst Pilger, Alexander Rosenkranz, Erich Pohanka, Rainer Oberbauer, Otto Traindl, Franz Xaver Roithinger, Bernhard Metzler, Hans-Peter Haring, Stefan Kiechl

Abstract

In 2010, eight Austrian medical societies proposed a joint position statement on the management of metabolic lipid disorders for the prevention of vascular complications. An updated and extended version of these recommendations according to the current literature is presented, referring to the primary and secondary prevention of vascular complications in adults, taking into consideration the guidelines of other societies. The "Austrian Lipid Consensus - 2016 update" provides guidance for individualized risk stratification and respective therapeutic targets, and discusses the evidence for reducing vascular endpoints with available lipid-lowering therapies. Furthermore, specific management in key patient groups is outlined, including subjects presenting with coronary, cerebrovascular, and/or peripheral atherosclerosis; diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome; nephropathy; and familial hypercholesterolemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#548
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,791
of 315,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.