↓ Skip to main content

Potential use of melatonin in sleep and delirium in the critically ill

Overview of attention for article published in BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential use of melatonin in sleep and delirium in the critically ill
Published in
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, April 2012
DOI 10.1093/bja/aes035
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Bellapart, R. Boots

Abstract

Intensive care delirium is a well-recognized complication in critically ill patients. Delirium is an independent risk factor for death in the intensive care unit (ICU), leading to oversedation, increased duration of mechanical ventilation, and increased length of stay. Although there has not been a direct causal relationship shown between sleep deprivation and delirium, many studies have demonstrated that critically ill patients have an altered sleep pattern, abnormal levels of melatonin, and loss of circadian rhythms. Melatonin has a major role in control of circadian rhythm and sleep regulation and other effects on the immune system, neuroprotection, and oxidant/anti-oxidant activity. There has been interest in the use of exogenous melatonin as a measure to improve sleep. However, there are only a few studies of melatonin in ICU patients and these use heterogeneous methodologies. Therefore, it is not possible at this stage to make any clear recommendations regarding the clinical use of melatonin in this setting. There is a need for well-designed randomized controlled trials examining the role of melatonin in ICU.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Greece 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 204 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 29 14%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 69 32%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,953,934
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#816
of 6,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,027
of 173,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.