↓ Skip to main content

Polyculture affects biomass production of component species but not total standing biomass and soil carbon stocks in a temperate forest plantation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Polyculture affects biomass production of component species but not total standing biomass and soil carbon stocks in a temperate forest plantation
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0875-2
Authors

Iftekhar U. Ahmed, Andrew R. Smith, Douglas L. Godbold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Environmental Science 11 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,622,234
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#415
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,809
of 349,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.