| Title |
Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet Ige, Lynn Gibbons, Issy Bray, Selena Gray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 47 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,342
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,237
of 343,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.