| Title |
Recommendation for hygiene and topical in neonatology from the French Neonatal Society
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-019-03451-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Renesme, A. Allen, F. Audeoud, C. Bouvard, A. Brandicourt, C. Casper, L. Cayemaex, H. Denoual, M. A. Duboz, A. Evrard, C. Fichtner, C. J. Fischer-Fumeaux, L. Girard, F. Gonnaud, D. Haumont, P. Hüppi, N. Knezovic, E. Laprugne-Garcia, S. Legouais, F. Mons, V. Pelofy, J. C. Picaud, V. Pierrat, P. Pladys, A. Reynaud, G. Souet, G. Thiriez, P. Tourneux, M. Touzet, P. Truffert, C. Zaoui, E. Zana-Taieb, C. Zores, J. Sizun, P. Kuhn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 64% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,507,265
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#920
of 3,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,289
of 340,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.