↓ Skip to main content

For antagonists and mutualists: the paradox of insect toxic secondary metabolites in nectar and pollen

Overview of attention for article published in Phytochemistry Reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
For antagonists and mutualists: the paradox of insect toxic secondary metabolites in nectar and pollen
Published in
Phytochemistry Reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11101-019-09642-y
Authors

Philip C. Stevenson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 36%
Environmental Science 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Chemistry 5 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,167,272
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#24
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,864
of 349,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them