↓ Skip to main content

Why all migraine patients should be treated with magnesium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,873)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
233 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
89 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Why all migraine patients should be treated with magnesium
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00702-012-0790-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Mauskop, Jasmine Varughese

Abstract

Magnesium, the second most abundant intracellular cation, is essential in many intracellular processes and appears to play an important role in migraine pathogenesis. Routine blood tests do not reflect true body magnesium stores since <2% is in the measurable, extracellular space, 67% is in the bone and 31% is located intracellularly. Lack of magnesium may promote cortical spreading depression, hyperaggregation of platelets, affect serotonin receptor function, and influence synthesis and release of a variety of neurotransmitters. Migraine sufferers may develop magnesium deficiency due to genetic inability to absorb magnesium, inherited renal magnesium wasting, excretion of excessive amounts of magnesium due to stress, low nutritional intake, and several other reasons. There is strong evidence that magnesium deficiency is much more prevalent in migraine sufferers than in healthy controls. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have produced mixed results, most likely because both magnesium deficient and non-deficient patients were included in these trials. This is akin to giving cyanocobalamine in a blinded fashion to a group of people with peripheral neuropathy without regard to their cyanocobalamine levels. Both oral and intravenous magnesium are widely available, extremely safe, very inexpensive and for patients who are magnesium deficient can be highly effective. Considering these features of magnesium, the fact that magnesium deficiency may be present in up to half of migraine patients, and that routine blood tests are not indicative of magnesium status, empiric treatment with at least oral magnesium is warranted in all migraine sufferers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Other 29 15%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 12%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 303. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#116,282
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#3
of 1,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#424
of 172,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.