↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of need for mental health rehabilitation amongst in-patients in a Welsh region

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
An assessment of need for mental health rehabilitation amongst in-patients in a Welsh region
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00127-016-1213-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tony Ryan, John Carden, Robert Higgo, Rob Poole, Catherine A. Robinson

Abstract

Rehabilitation services have received little attention in the literature compared with other types of mental health service provision over the past 15 years. However, they are an important component of whole-system functioning in mental health services. Lack of provision has a particular impact on acute in-patient services. Poor pathway management can result in delayed discharges, placement of service users far from home, and resultant loss of resource for the local mental health economy. A cross-sectional study gathered demographic, clinical, service utilisation, and financial data on 100 participants from out of area, rehabilitation and acute mental health units. Financial data was provided by the Health Board. Other data were gathered by two clinicians from case records and staff interviews. 26.0 % of people were inappropriately placed, with frequent overprovision of support. It was calculated that within an annual budget of £12.7 M, £2.5 M (19.7 % of the total expenditure on this patient group) could be saved if all placements were appropriate. There were differences between the three cohorts. Those placed out of area had the most complex needs, although those in rehabilitation placements were similar. Most participants had been in contact with services for more than 5 years. A system better matched to their needs would benefit these patients and would also generate financial savings for reinvestment in the mental health economy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 32%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,360,026
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,132
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,386
of 302,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.