You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incorporating climate change into systematic conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0269-3 |
| Authors |
Craig R. Groves, Edward T. Game, Mark G. Anderson, Molly Cross, Carolyn Enquist, Zach Ferdaña, Evan Girvetz, Anne Gondor, Kimberly R. Hall, Jonathan Higgins, Rob Marshall, Ken Popper, Steve Schill, Sarah L. Shafer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 674 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 635 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 148 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 107 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 253 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 244 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 1% |
| Engineering | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Unknown | 106 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,302,760
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#171
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,990
of 186,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.