You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Validity of Google Trends Search Volumes for Behavioral Forecasting of National Suicide Rates in Ireland
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.3390/ijerph16173201 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joana M. Barros, Ruth Melia, Kady Francis, John Bogue, Mary O’Sullivan, Karen Young, Rebecca A. Bernert, Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann, Jim Duggan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 5 | 45% |
United States | 3 | 27% |
Germany | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 32 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 12 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,239,183
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#4,039
of 31,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,325
of 350,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#124
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.