↓ Skip to main content

World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Global Health, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1797 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions
Published in
The Lancet Global Health, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30318-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

The WHO CVD Risk Chart Working Group, Stephen Kaptoge, Lisa Pennells, Dirk De Bacquer, Marie Therese Cooney, Maryam Kavousi, Gretchen Stevens, Leanne Margaret Riley, Stefan Savin, Taskeen Khan, Servet Altay, Philippe Amouyel, Gerd Assmann, Steven Bell, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Lisa Berkman, Joline W Beulens, Cecilia Björkelund, Michael Blaha, Dan G Blazer, Thomas Bolton, Ruth Bonita Beaglehole, Hermann Brenner, Eric J Brunner, Edoardo Casiglia, Parinya Chamnan, Yeun-Hyang Choi, Rajiv Chowdry, Sean Coady, Carlos J Crespo, Mary Cushman, Gilles R Dagenais, Ralph B D'Agostino, Makoto Daimon, Karina W Davidson, Gunnar Engström, Ian Ford, John Gallacher, Ron T Gansevoort, Thomas Andrew Gaziano, Simona Giampaoli, Greg Grandits, Sameline Grimsgaard, Diederick E Grobbee, Vilmundur Gudnason, Qi Guo, Hanna Tolonen, Steve Humphries, Hiroyasu Iso, J Wouter Jukema, Jussi Kauhanen, Andre Pascal Kengne, Davood Khalili, Wolfgang Koenig, Daan Kromhout, Harlan Krumholz, TH Lam, Gail Laughlin, Alejandro Marín Ibañez, Tom W Meade, Karel G M Moons, Paul J Nietert, Toshiharu Ninomiya, Børge G Nordestgaard, Christopher O'Donnell, Luigi Palmieri, Anushka Patel, Pablo Perel, Jackie F Price, Rui Providencia, Paul M Ridker, Beatriz Rodriguez, Annika Rosengren, Ronan Roussel, Masaru Sakurai, Veikko Salomaa, Shinichi Sato, Ben Schöttker, Nawar Shara, Jonathan E Shaw, Hee-Choon Shin, Leon A Simons, Eleni Sofianopoulou, Johan Sundström, Henry Völzke, Robert B Wallace, Nicholas J Wareham, Peter Willeit, David Wood, Angela Wood, Dong Zhao, Mark Woodward, Goodarz Danaei, Gregory Roth, Shanthi Mendis, Oyere Onuma, Cherian Varghese, Majid Ezzati, Ian Graham, Rod Jackson, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,797 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1797 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 190 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 8%
Researcher 142 8%
Student > Bachelor 119 7%
Student > Postgraduate 82 5%
Other 281 16%
Unknown 832 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 329 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 104 6%
Engineering 42 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 2%
Other 248 14%
Unknown 901 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2026.
All research outputs
#480,151
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#363
of 3,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,838
of 378,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#8
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.