You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the effect size of the 15Q11.2 BP1–BP2 deletion and its contribution to neurodevelopmental symptoms: recommendations for practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aia Elise Jønch, Elise Douard, Clara Moreau, Anke Van Dijck, Marzia Passeggeri, Frank Kooy, Jacques Puechberty, Carolyn Campbell, Damien Sanlaville, Henrietta Lefroy, Sonia Richetin, Aurelie Pain, David Geneviève, Usha Kini, Cédric Le Caignec, James Lespinasse, Anne-Bine Skytte, Bertrand Isidor, Christiane Zweier, Jean-Hubert Caberg, Marie-Ange Delrue, Rikke Steensbjerre Møller, Anders Bojesen, Helle Hjalgrim, Charlotte Brasch-Andersen, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Lilian Bomme Ousager, Sébastien Jacquemont, Joris Andrieux, Angela Barnicoat, Patricia Blanchet, Sophie Blesson, Florence Niel Bütschi, Philippe M Campeau, Nora Chelloug, François-Guillaume Debray, Florence Fellmann, Alessandra Ferrarini, Richard Gibbons, Pernille Axel Gregersen, Juliane Hoyer, Ulrike Hüffmeier, Ditte Kjelgaard, Mandy Krumbiegel, Sébastien Lebon, Gaetan Lesca, Stéphanie Marignier, Sandra Mercier, Jacques Michaud, Grant Mitchell, Isabelle Mortemousque, Rikke S Møller, Mathilde Nizon, Genevieve Pierquin, Kristina Pilekær Sørensen, Sue Price, Pascal H Pujol, Vincent Ramaekers, Martine Raynaud, André Reis, Massimiliano Rossi, Pierre Sarda, Franco Stanzial, Helen Stewart, Dea Svaneby, Christian T Theil, Marianne Till, Yannis Trakadis, Dorothée Ville, Sandrine Vonwill, Andrew Wilkie, Antje Wiessner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,170,799
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2,539
of 2,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,328
of 340,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#36
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.