↓ Skip to main content

In-vitro cell treatment with focused shockwaves—influence of the experimental setup on the sound field and biological reaction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
In-vitro cell treatment with focused shockwaves—influence of the experimental setup on the sound field and biological reaction
Published in
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40349-016-0053-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Dietz-Laursonn, Rainer Beckmann, Siegfried Ginter, Klaus Radermacher, Matías de la Fuente

Abstract

To improve understanding of shockwave therapy mechanisms, in vitro experiments are conducted and the correlation between cell reaction and shockwave parameters like the maximum pressure or energy density is studied. If the shockwave is not measured in the experimental setup used, it is usually assumed that the device's shockwave parameters (=manufacturer's free field measurements) are valid. But this applies only for in vitro setups which do not modify the shockwave, e.g., by reflection or refraction. We hypothesize that most setups used for in vitro shockwave experiments described in the literature influence the sound field significantly so that correlations between the physical parameters and the biological reaction are not valid. To reveal the components of common shockwave in vitro setups which mainly influence the sound field, 32 publications with 37 setups used for focused shockwave experiments were reviewed and evaluated regarding cavitation, cell container material, focal sound field size relative to cell model size, and distance between treated cells and air. For further evaluation of the severity of those influences, experiments and calculations were conducted. In 37 setups, 17 different combinations of coupling, cell container, and cell model are described. The setup used mainly is a transducer coupled via water to a tube filled with a cell suspension. As changes of the shockwaves' maximum pressure of 11 % can already induce changes of the biological reaction, the sound field and biological reactions are mainly disturbed by use of standard cell containers, use of coupling gel, air within the 5 MPa focal zone, and cell model sizes which are bigger than half the -6 dB focal dimensions. Until now, correct and sufficient information about the shockwave influencing cells in vitro is only provided in 1 of 32 publications. Based on these findings, guidelines for improved in vitro setups are proposed which help minimize the influence of the setup on the sound field.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,318,358
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#72
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,005
of 300,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.