Title |
Cerebrovascular pathology: the dark side of neurodegeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00401-016-1573-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roxana O. Carare, Rajesh Kalaria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 15% |
Psychology | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,948,600
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#748
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,658
of 300,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.