↓ Skip to main content

Context Impacts on Confirmation Bias: Evidence From the 2017 Japanese Snap Election Compared with American and German Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Human Communication Research, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Context Impacts on Confirmation Bias: Evidence From the 2017 Japanese Snap Election Compared with American and German Findings
Published in
Human Communication Research, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/hcr/hqz005
Authors

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Ling Liu, Airo Hino, Axel Westerwick, Benjamin K Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 33%
Psychology 5 21%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,579,612
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Human Communication Research
#385
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,437
of 349,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Communication Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them