↓ Skip to main content

Joint action without robust theory of mind

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Joint action without robust theory of mind
Published in
Synthese, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02386-4
Authors

Daniel Story

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 18%
Psychology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,077,692
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#2,070
of 2,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,710
of 344,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#47
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.