| Title |
An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1131-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Mathes, Dawid Pieper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,762,902
of 24,294,766 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,334
of 2,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,035
of 344,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.