| Title |
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Vorapaxar in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus Results of the OPTIMUS-5 Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.07.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Franchi, Fabiana Rollini, Victor Kairouz, Jose Rivas Rios, Andrea Rivas, Malhar Agarwal, Maryuri Briceno, Mustafa Wali, Ahmed Nawaz, Gabriel Silva, Zubair Shaikh, Naji Maaliki, Latonya Been, Jason Piraino, Andres M. Pineda, Siva Suryadevara, Daniel Soffer, Martin M. Zenni, Lisa K. Jennings, Theodore A. Bass, Dominick J. Angiolillo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,428,875
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#127
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,862
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.