↓ Skip to main content

Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover.

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover.
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2019
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0435
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C. Cross, Diann J. Prosser, Andrew M. Ramey, Ephraim M. Hanks, Kim M. Pepin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,516
of 7,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,900
of 354,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#78
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.