↓ Skip to main content

Cinematic rendering of skin and subcutaneous soft tissues: potential applications in acute trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Radiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Cinematic rendering of skin and subcutaneous soft tissues: potential applications in acute trauma
Published in
Emergency Radiology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10140-019-01697-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda C. Chu, Steven P. Rowe, Elliot K. Fishman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,578,452
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#453
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,140
of 349,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.