| Title |
Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-019-00375-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernd Saugel, Julia Heeschen, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Stefano Romagnoli, Gillis Greiwe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,255,873
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#75
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,672
of 340,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.