↓ Skip to main content

Rhopalia are integrated parts of the central nervous system in box jellyfish

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 2,279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Rhopalia are integrated parts of the central nervous system in box jellyfish
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00441-005-0134-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Garm, P. Ekström, M. Boudes, D.-E. Nilsson

Abstract

In cubomedusae, the central nervous system (CNS) is found both in the bell (the ring nerve) and in the four eye-bearing sensory structures (the rhopalia). The ring nerve and the rhopalia are connected via the rhopalial stalks and examination of the structure of the rhopalial stalks therefore becomes important when trying to comprehend visual processing. In the present study, the rhopalial stalk of the cubomedusae Tripedalia cystophora has been examined by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electrophysiology. A major part of the ring nerve is shown to continue into the stalk and to contact the rhopalial neuropil directly. Ultrastructural analysis of synapse distribution in the rhopalial stalk has failed to show any clustering, which indicates that integration of the visual input is probably spread throughout the CNS. Together, the results indicate that cubomedusae have one coherent CNS including the rhopalia. Additionally, a novel gastrodermal nerve has been found in the stalk; this nerve is not involved in visual processing but is likely to be mechanosensory and part of a proprioceptory system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Turkey 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Computer Science 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 5 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,870,536
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#25
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,345
of 67,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them