| Title |
Hyperpolarized 3helium magnetic resonance ventilation imaging of the lung in cystic fibrosis: comparison with high resolution CT and spirometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-006-0311-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colm J. McMahon, Jonathan D. Dodd, Catherine Hill, Neil Woodhouse, Jim M. Wild, Stan Fichele, Charles G. Gallagher, Stephen J. Skehan, Edwin J. R. van Beek, James B. Masterson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 47% |
| Engineering | 7 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,478,082
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,124
of 4,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,738
of 65,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.