↓ Skip to main content

Animal breeding in the age of biotechnology: the investigative pathway behind the cloning of Dolly the sheep

Overview of attention for article published in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 482)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Animal breeding in the age of biotechnology: the investigative pathway behind the cloning of Dolly the sheep
Published in
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40656-015-0078-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel García-Sancho

Abstract

This paper addresses the 1996 cloning of Dolly the sheep, locating it within a long-standing tradition of animal breeding research in Edinburgh. Far from being an end in itself, the cell-nuclear transfer experiment from which Dolly was born should be seen as a step in an investigative pathway that sought the production of medically relevant transgenic animals. By historicising Dolly, I illustrate how the birth of this sheep captures a dramatic redefinition of the life sciences, when in the 1970s and 1980s the rise of neo-liberal governments and the emergence of the biotechnology market pushed research institutions to show tangible applications of their work. Through this broader interpretative framework, the Dolly story emerges as a case study of the deep transformations of agricultural experimentation during the last third of the twentieth century. The reorganisation of laboratory practice, human resources and institutional settings required by the production of transgenic animals had unanticipated consequences. One of these unanticipated effects was that the boundaries between animal and human health became blurred. As a result of this, new professional spaces emerged and the identity of Dolly the sheep was reconfigured, from an instrument for livestock improvement in the farm to a more universal symbol of the new cloning age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Unspecified 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 42 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 44 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,817,853
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#29
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,823
of 266,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.