| Title |
Revision of the genus Melamphaes (Melamphaidae). 5. Oligo-raker species: M. indicus, M. eurous, and M. typhlops
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ichthyology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s0032945216010057 |
| Authors |
A. N. Kotlyar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 75% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,971,964
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ichthyology
#30
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,943
of 300,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ichthyology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them