↓ Skip to main content

Does a Therapist’s World View Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Does a Therapist’s World View Matter?
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10943-016-0208-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Peteet, Vithya B. Rodriguez, Marta D. Herschkopf, Alyssa McCarthy, Jennifer Betts, Stephanie Romo, J. Michael Murphy

Abstract

While past research indicates that mental health professionals are less religious than the public they serve, little is known about the implications of therapists' world views for their practice. In this study, approximately 50 therapists completed surveys that assessed self-identification in relation to spirituality, religion, and/or world view; how relevant they considered their patients' and their own world views; and responses to clinical vignettes involving issues arising in treatment. While a minority considered themselves religious, a majority indicated that they considered themselves moderately or very spiritual. When asked how they would respond to a series of clinical vignettes involving topics such as assisted suicide and encouraging the use of spiritual resources, responses varied significantly by world view. Respondents endorsed several factors limiting the integration of religion/spiritualities/world views into their clinical work. These data raise questions about how to further explore the clinical relevance of the therapist's world view.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 21%