| Title |
Aortic Arch Pseudoaneurysm Associated With Chronic Trauma by Resected Edge of the Left Clavicle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Case Reports, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.06.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Numata, Keiichi Kanda, Hitoshi Yaku |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,064,271
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#271
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,025
of 350,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#12
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.