↓ Skip to main content

GABA Neurons of the VTA Drive Conditioned Place Aversion

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
patent
4 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
800 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GABA Neurons of the VTA Drive Conditioned Place Aversion
Published in
Neuron, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly R. Tan, Cédric Yvon, Marc Turiault, Julie J. Mirzabekov, Jana Doehner, Gwenaël Labouèbe, Karl Deisseroth, Kay M. Tye, Christian Lüscher

Abstract

Salient but aversive stimuli inhibit the majority of dopamine (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and cause conditioned place aversion (CPA). The cellular mechanism underlying DA neuron inhibition has not been investigated and the causal link to behavior remains elusive. Here, we show that GABA neurons of the VTA inhibit DA neurons through neurotransmission at GABA(A) receptors. We also observe that GABA neurons increase their firing in response to a footshock and provide evidence that driving GABA neurons with optogenetic effectors is sufficient to affect behavior. Taken together, our data demonstrate that synaptic inhibition of DA neurons drives place aversion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 800 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 3%
France 7 <1%
China 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 755 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 231 29%
Researcher 139 17%
Student > Master 75 9%
Student > Bachelor 73 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 6%
Other 111 14%
Unknown 121 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 241 30%
Neuroscience 239 30%
Psychology 52 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 4%
Other 54 7%
Unknown 141 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,999,757
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#3,063
of 9,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,205
of 176,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#25
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.